- To get familiar with Power World Simulator V.18.0
- Perform load flow analysis on a given circuit
- Introduce contingencies at different nodes and check for Voltage stability using Q-V Curves
Voltage stability studies the effect of variation in reactive power on the voltage of the system. QV relationship shows the sensitivity and variation of bus voltages with respect to reactive power injections or absorptions. A system is voltage stable if V – Q sensitivity is positive for every bus, and voltage unstable if V – Q sensitivity is negative for at least one bus.
In order to create a QV curve, a fictitious generator is placed at the bus which is being analyzed. The voltage set- point of this generator is then varied and its VAR output is allowed to be ANY value needed to meet this voltage set- point. At some point, the MVAR value of the generator will stop decreasing and reach the “bottom” of the curve. This point represents the maximum increase in the load MVAR at this bus. Any higher and voltage collapse would occur. If the QV curve does not cross the x – axis, this means the system cannot solve this case.
The V- Q sensitivity of a bus is the slope of its QV curve at the given operating point. Positive sensitivity indicates a stable system. Smaller positive sensitivity indicates more stable system. Negative sensitivity indicates an unstable system. To maintain stability expect voltage (V) to increase as VARs (Q) are increased.
- TASK 1: When the Load at bus 5 is 40 Mvar determine stability for the base and contingency case.
When the connection between bus 5 and bus 2 is removed this shows the contingency case and when the connection between them is connected this is referred to as base case.
Circuit For Base-case with 40 Mvar load on Bus-5:
The base case operating point of the system is represented by the x-intercept of the curve. This is the point where the fictitious generator is at 0 Mvar output and represents the base case. There are situations in which the output of the fictitious generator is not 0 Mvar in the base case, but these will be explained with the appropriate option settings. When considering a contingency scenario in the QV analysis, the term base case operating point will also be used. This is the starting case that represents the system prior to performing any analysis for the curve tracing.
Tracing down the curve from higher to lower voltage set-points represents a decrease in the fictitious generator’s Mvar output which is representative of an increase in Mvar load. The curve is then tracing what the voltage would be as the Mvar load increases. At some point the Mvar value of the generator will stop decreasing and the bottom of the curve will be reached. This point represents the maximum increase in load Mvar that can occur at this bus before voltage collapse is reached.
Base Case For 40 Mvar:
- BUS 3 BASE CASE QV CURVE:
Bus-3 base-case QV curve
- BUS 5 BASE CASE QV CURVE:
Bus-5 base-case QV curve
If the lowest point of curve lies below the x-axis, it indicates the Maximum Mvar load before collapse and if lies above the x-axis it indicates the Max. Mvar needed to come out of collapse. The base case operating point of the system is represented by the x-intercept of the curve where the slope of curve is positive.
For the Bus 3 curve where it intercepts x-axis from right side which indicates a Q-V sensitivity to be positive (Base case operating point), which indicates that it achieves voltage stability.
For Bus 5 the curve cuts the x-axis at 2 points. Cut on left side indicates that QV sensitivity is negative and right side cut indicates a QV sensitivity to be positive and this is its base case operating point.
FOR CONTINGENCY CASE FOR 40 Mvar on Bus-5:
o Bus 3 Contingency Case Qv Curve:
Values diverge in contingency case for bus 3. So, we cannot certainly conclude about the stability at this point as solution does not diverge to a single plausible operating point.
BUS 5 CONTINGENCY CASE QV CURVE:
Analysis: For the bus 5 minima of curve does not cross the x-axis and it need more Mvar to come out of contingency. So load collapse occurs on this bus and it is unstable with respect to voltage stability. This bus needs more Mvar to avoid load collapse. As compared to base case contingency case is less stable (or almost unstable) for 40 Mvar as can be shown in curves. By observing q-v curve for bus 5 contingency case, we see that it requires almost 20 Mvar to come out of voltage collapse.